gh0s7/mckernel
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Linux lockless linked list implementation

Browse Source 
Change-Id: I8bd6ee989cecac269b55b3a0ff10cf8543629001
This commit is contained in:
Balazs Gerofi
2019-04-02 10:50:24 +09:00
parent 0d902872a1
commit 0cf89c5682
4 changed files with 335 additions and 1 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

2
kernel/CMakeLists.txt
View File

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ set(MCKERNEL_SRCS
init.c mem.c debug.c mikc.c listeners.c ap.c syscall.c cls.c host.c process.c
copy.c waitq.c futex.c timer.c plist.c fileobj.c shmobj.c zeroobj.c
procfs.c devobj.c sysfs.c xpmem.c profile.c freeze.c rbtree.c pager.c
gencore.c hugefileobj.c
gencore.c hugefileobj.c llist.c
${IHK_FULL_SOURCE_DIR}/ikc/manycore.c
${IHK_FULL_SOURCE_DIR}/ikc/master.c

233
kernel/include/llist.h Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,233 @@
#ifndef LLIST_H
#define LLIST_H
/*
* Lock-less NULL terminated single linked list
*
* Cases where locking is not needed:
* If there are multiple producers and multiple consumers, llist_add can be
* used in producers and llist_del_all can be used in consumers simultaneously
* without locking. Also a single consumer can use llist_del_first while
* multiple producers simultaneously use llist_add, without any locking.
*
* Cases where locking is needed:
* If we have multiple consumers with llist_del_first used in one consumer, and
* llist_del_first or llist_del_all used in other consumers, then a lock is
* needed. This is because llist_del_first depends on list->first->next not
* changing, but without lock protection, there's no way to be sure about that
* if a preemption happens in the middle of the delete operation and on being
* preempted back, the list->first is the same as before causing the cmpxchg in
* llist_del_first to succeed. For example, while a llist_del_first operation
* is in progress in one consumer, then a llist_del_first, llist_add,
* llist_add (or llist_del_all, llist_add, llist_add) sequence in another
* consumer may cause violations.
*
* This can be summarized as follows:
*
* | add | del_first | del_all
* add | - | - | -
* del_first | | L | L
* del_all | | | -
*
* Where, a particular row's operation can happen concurrently with a column's
* operation, with "-" being no lock needed, while "L" being lock is needed.
*
* The list entries deleted via llist_del_all can be traversed with
* traversing function such as llist_for_each etc. But the list
* entries can not be traversed safely before deleted from the list.
* The order of deleted entries is from the newest to the oldest added
* one. If you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you
* must reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
*
* The basic atomic operation of this list is cmpxchg on long. On
* architectures that don't have NMI-safe cmpxchg implementation, the
* list can NOT be used in NMI handlers. So code that uses the list in
* an NMI handler should depend on CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG.
*
* Copyright 2010,2011 Intel Corp.
* Author: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
*
*/
#include <types.h>
#include <lwk/compiler.h>
#include <ihk/atomic.h>
#include <arch/cpu.h>
struct llist_head {
struct llist_node *first;
};
struct llist_node {
struct llist_node *next;
};
#define LLIST_HEAD_INIT(name) { NULL }
#define LLIST_HEAD(name) struct llist_head name = LLIST_HEAD_INIT(name)
/**
* init_llist_head - initialize lock-less list head
* @head: the head for your lock-less list
*/
static inline void init_llist_head(struct llist_head *list)
{
list->first = NULL;
}
/**
* llist_entry - get the struct of this entry
* @ptr: the &struct llist_node pointer.
* @type: the type of the struct this is embedded in.
* @member: the name of the llist_node within the struct.
*/
#define llist_entry(ptr, type, member) \
container_of(ptr, type, member)
/**
* member_address_is_nonnull - check whether the member address is not NULL
* @ptr: the object pointer (struct type * that contains the llist_node)
* @member: the name of the llist_node within the struct.
*
* This macro is conceptually the same as
* &ptr->member != NULL
* but it works around the fact that compilers can decide that taking a member
* address is never a NULL pointer.
*
* Real objects that start at a high address and have a member at NULL are
* unlikely to exist, but such pointers may be returned e.g. by the
* container_of() macro.
*/
#define member_address_is_nonnull(ptr, member) \
((uintptr_t)(ptr) + offsetof(typeof(*(ptr)), member) != 0)
/**
* llist_for_each - iterate over some deleted entries of a lock-less list
* @pos: the &struct llist_node to use as a loop cursor
* @node: the first entry of deleted list entries
*
* In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
* safely only after being deleted from list, so start with an entry
* instead of list head.
*
* If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
* traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
* you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
* reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
*/
#define llist_for_each(pos, node) \
for ((pos) = (node); pos; (pos) = (pos)->next)
/**
* llist_for_each_safe - iterate over some deleted entries of a lock-less list
* safe against removal of list entry
* @pos: the &struct llist_node to use as a loop cursor
* @n: another &struct llist_node to use as temporary storage
* @node: the first entry of deleted list entries
*
* In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
* safely only after being deleted from list, so start with an entry
* instead of list head.
*
* If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
* traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
* you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
* reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
*/
#define llist_for_each_safe(pos, n, node) \
for ((pos) = (node); (pos) && ((n) = (pos)->next, true); (pos) = (n))
/**
* llist_for_each_entry - iterate over some deleted entries of lock-less
* list of given type
* @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
* @node: the fist entry of deleted list entries.
* @member: the name of the llist_node with the struct.
*
* In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
* safely only after being removed from list, so start with an entry
* instead of list head.
*
* If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
* traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
* you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
* reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
*/
#define llist_for_each_entry(pos, node, member) \
for ((pos) = llist_entry((node), typeof(*(pos)), member); \
member_address_is_nonnull(pos, member); \
(pos) = llist_entry((pos)->member.next, typeof(*(pos)), member))
/**
* llist_for_each_entry_safe - iterate over some deleted entries of lock-less
* list of given type,
* safe against removal of list entry
* @pos: the type * to use as a loop cursor.
* @n: another type * to use as temporary storage
* @node: the first entry of deleted list entries.
* @member: the name of the llist_node with the struct.
*
* In general, some entries of the lock-less list can be traversed
* safely only after being removed from list, so start with an entry
* instead of list head.
*
* If being used on entries deleted from lock-less list directly, the
* traverse order is from the newest to the oldest added entry. If
* you want to traverse from the oldest to the newest, you must
* reverse the order by yourself before traversing.
*/
#define llist_for_each_entry_safe(pos, n, node, member) \
for (pos = llist_entry((node), typeof(*pos), member); \
member_address_is_nonnull(pos, member) && \
(n = llist_entry(pos->member.next, typeof(*n), member), true); \
pos = n)
/**
* llist_empty - tests whether a lock-less list is empty
* @head: the list to test
*
* Not guaranteed to be accurate or up to date. Just a quick way to
* test whether the list is empty without deleting something from the
* list.
*/
static inline bool llist_empty(const struct llist_head *head)
{
return ACCESS_ONCE(head->first) == NULL;
}
static inline struct llist_node *llist_next(struct llist_node *node)
{
return node->next;
}
extern bool llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first,
struct llist_node *new_last,
struct llist_head *head);
/**
* llist_add - add a new entry
* @new: new entry to be added
* @head: the head for your lock-less list
*
* Returns true if the list was empty prior to adding this entry.
*/
static inline bool llist_add(struct llist_node *new, struct llist_head *head)
{
return llist_add_batch(new, new, head);
}
/**
* llist_del_all - delete all entries from lock-less list
* @head: the head of lock-less list to delete all entries
*
* If list is empty, return NULL, otherwise, delete all entries and
* return the pointer to the first entry. The order of entries
* deleted is from the newest to the oldest added one.
*/
static inline struct llist_node *llist_del_all(struct llist_head *head)
{
return xchg(&head->first, NULL);
}
extern struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head);
struct llist_node *llist_reverse_order(struct llist_node *head);
#endif /* LLIST_H */

97
kernel/llist.c Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,97 @@
/*
* Lock-less NULL terminated single linked list
*
* The basic atomic operation of this list is cmpxchg on long. On
* architectures that don't have NMI-safe cmpxchg implementation, the
* list can NOT be used in NMI handlers. So code that uses the list in
* an NMI handler should depend on CONFIG_ARCH_HAVE_NMI_SAFE_CMPXCHG.
*
* Copyright 2010,2011 Intel Corp.
* Author: Huang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com>
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 as published by the Free Software Foundation;
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
* GNU General Public License for more details.
*/
#include <llist.h>
/**
* llist_add_batch - add several linked entries in batch
* @new_first: first entry in batch to be added
* @new_last: last entry in batch to be added
* @head: the head for your lock-less list
*
* Return whether list is empty before adding.
*/
bool llist_add_batch(struct llist_node *new_first, struct llist_node *new_last,
struct llist_head *head)
{
struct llist_node *first;
do {
new_last->next = first = ACCESS_ONCE(head->first);
} while (cmpxchg(&head->first, first, new_first) != first);
return !first;
}
/**
* llist_del_first - delete the first entry of lock-less list
* @head: the head for your lock-less list
*
* If list is empty, return NULL, otherwise, return the first entry
* deleted, this is the newest added one.
*
* Only one llist_del_first user can be used simultaneously with
* multiple llist_add users without lock. Because otherwise
* llist_del_first, llist_add, llist_add (or llist_del_all, llist_add,
* llist_add) sequence in another user may change @head->first->next,
* but keep @head->first. If multiple consumers are needed, please
* use llist_del_all or use lock between consumers.
*/
struct llist_node *llist_del_first(struct llist_head *head)
{
struct llist_node *entry, *old_entry, *next;
entry = smp_load_acquire(&head->first);
for (;;) {
if (entry == NULL)
return NULL;
old_entry = entry;
next = READ_ONCE(entry->next);
entry = cmpxchg(&head->first, old_entry, next);
if (entry == old_entry)
break;
}
return entry;
}
/**
* llist_reverse_order - reverse order of a llist chain
* @head: first item of the list to be reversed
*
* Reverse the order of a chain of llist entries and return the
* new first entry.
*/
struct llist_node *llist_reverse_order(struct llist_node *head)
{
struct llist_node *new_head = NULL;
while (head) {
struct llist_node *tmp = head;
head = head->next;
tmp->next = new_head;
new_head = tmp;
}
return new_head;
}